* I am a big fan of shows being weekly. I powered through Stranger Things like it was my job yesterday to avoid being more spoiled. I want media that respects my time. It's also better for fandom.
Interestingly, in his second What Chaos interview Jacob Tierney said it's better for him as a creator. He can better tell what is hitting and what is not when the shows come out weekly. The feedback he wants to polish his craft doesn't exist in the binge model.
* Fandom has had top/bottom discourse forever. 99% of it is bad faith. First off all, yes, some gay people *do* identify as tops and bottoms. It was more common in the 80s and 90s, but it's still a thing that happens and is part of North American gay culture. (And elsewhere, but I am talking about NA here) Also, tagging a character as a top or bottom in a fic isn't a big fucking deal, it's telling people what type of smut to expect.
So, anyway, neither Shane or Ilya have top or bottom as part of their identity, but they have clear roles sexually. When the books were adapted by a gay man he didn't soften that, he leaned into it. I am shattered that my mind isn't dirty enough to have picked up on team logos being either phallic or.... peach-tastic. He assigned whole teams as tops and bottoms. Boston and Dallas? Tops. Montreal andSan Jose San Francisco? Bottoms.
He's not being serious. It's a joke, a joke that works because, yes, tops and bottoms are things in NA-based gay culture. Even though, yes, a significant percentage of gay men don't actually engage in that.
It's a really bad sign of how much long-term fannish discourse has gotten into my head that seeing a gay man divide the entire NHL into tops and bottoms as a joke feels so good. I've been hearing people scream online that the concept of tops and bottoms doesn't exist outside of women fetishizing gay men, but that bullshit take only works online. There is a section of people in fandom who spend all day online and post a lot who really need to crack a window. I've known multiple gay men who ID this way, and it's usually a bit tongue in cheek. But yeah, me tagging who tops in a fic is not that big of a fucking deal, people need to settle down.
* Related to my last point about the section of online fandom that needs to crack a window... Before Heated Rivalry came out there was a creator whose deep dives on the books were the top google and youtube search results. He's had to private those videos and most of his content because when the show blew up the most detached-from-reality online discourses latched onto his videos and spewed comments that don't even make sense. It's just concentrated, fermented discourse that some people have made their entire personality. They were telling him his experiences and identity as a gay man weren't valid over and over again to the point where he mostly erased his entire foray into content creation because he couldn't handle the sheer volume of people saying the same things to him over and over.
Interestingly, in his second What Chaos interview Jacob Tierney said it's better for him as a creator. He can better tell what is hitting and what is not when the shows come out weekly. The feedback he wants to polish his craft doesn't exist in the binge model.
* Fandom has had top/bottom discourse forever. 99% of it is bad faith. First off all, yes, some gay people *do* identify as tops and bottoms. It was more common in the 80s and 90s, but it's still a thing that happens and is part of North American gay culture. (And elsewhere, but I am talking about NA here) Also, tagging a character as a top or bottom in a fic isn't a big fucking deal, it's telling people what type of smut to expect.
So, anyway, neither Shane or Ilya have top or bottom as part of their identity, but they have clear roles sexually. When the books were adapted by a gay man he didn't soften that, he leaned into it. I am shattered that my mind isn't dirty enough to have picked up on team logos being either phallic or.... peach-tastic. He assigned whole teams as tops and bottoms. Boston and Dallas? Tops. Montreal and
He's not being serious. It's a joke, a joke that works because, yes, tops and bottoms are things in NA-based gay culture. Even though, yes, a significant percentage of gay men don't actually engage in that.
It's a really bad sign of how much long-term fannish discourse has gotten into my head that seeing a gay man divide the entire NHL into tops and bottoms as a joke feels so good. I've been hearing people scream online that the concept of tops and bottoms doesn't exist outside of women fetishizing gay men, but that bullshit take only works online. There is a section of people in fandom who spend all day online and post a lot who really need to crack a window. I've known multiple gay men who ID this way, and it's usually a bit tongue in cheek. But yeah, me tagging who tops in a fic is not that big of a fucking deal, people need to settle down.
* Related to my last point about the section of online fandom that needs to crack a window... Before Heated Rivalry came out there was a creator whose deep dives on the books were the top google and youtube search results. He's had to private those videos and most of his content because when the show blew up the most detached-from-reality online discourses latched onto his videos and spewed comments that don't even make sense. It's just concentrated, fermented discourse that some people have made their entire personality. They were telling him his experiences and identity as a gay man weren't valid over and over again to the point where he mostly erased his entire foray into content creation because he couldn't handle the sheer volume of people saying the same things to him over and over.
no subject
Date: 2026-01-05 02:00 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2026-01-05 03:28 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2026-01-05 04:15 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2026-01-05 04:53 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2026-01-05 04:58 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2026-01-05 05:46 am (UTC)From:I also apologize in advance for any Joey Daccord posts I may make >.>
no subject
Date: 2026-01-05 06:04 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2026-01-05 06:50 am (UTC)From:I'd love more hockey fans on my feed. Hrm, I wonder if a hockey-friending meme is possible?
no subject
Date: 2026-01-05 05:34 am (UTC)From:Fucking top/bottom discourse; the wank that will never die.
Man, that sucks for that creator. I'm so glad to see such an excited fandom for something like this... but UGH, of course that comes with the between 1 and 10% of fans that decide to be utterly unhinged and toxic at people. Ugh.
no subject
Date: 2026-01-05 05:53 am (UTC)From:I want canons to respect my time and be good fandom fodder, fun thing to chat about. I am so over binging being the default.
Yeah, unhinged fans and also dedicated discourses who hop to whatever is big, whether or not they've consumed the canon. The amount of discoursers who talk like Shane is white because they want to smugly say the things the same things they always say, the things they feel so smart for saying ....
no subject
Date: 2026-01-06 06:27 am (UTC)From:Big same. I rarely get into the big fandom thing, but I like SEEING things get fandom, rather than things just being a flash on release date and then crickets. Plus, as someone who is just terrible at watching something right away, I like feeling like I could catch up on something and join in at a later time, which is much more possible with things on a slower release schedule. When something was released in one go, and everyone already binged it, binging it later does not give much of an entry into fandom, because the fandom enthusiasm has probably burned out.
Ugh. That is so frustrating. You're right: a lot of the worst culprits just love to jump fandoms and pick the same fights the instant something new is getting popular. They don't watch those canons or care if those fights actually make sense or if the points they're making have any factual basis. They just want to be smug and right and spread misery, lol
no subject
Date: 2026-01-06 06:26 pm (UTC)From:I have binged traditionally formatted shows, but I'd like that to be an option. TV shouldn't feel like an obligation. Yeah, people need time to catch up and have a chance to be a part of things. I honestly think that Netflix is going to have a rough year this year with their one in-house IP being over and focusing on content that is designed to be second-screen content.
no subject
Date: 2026-01-05 06:44 am (UTC)From:This is giving me a headache, I thought we were beyond that. (I am not that tuned into the online bs anymore for...reasons.) Yes, people do, get over it. jfc.
no subject
Date: 2026-01-05 07:12 am (UTC)From: