It was my last day in NYC and I wasn't sure if I wanted to go anything in particular or just wander. When I am in cities, I am mostly wandering and not doing museums and things like that. It felt weird to not be spending time just exploring. But, I decided to go because of William. William is a small turquoise blue hippo that's the Met's mascot. I had a kid's book of him and couldn't resist buying a small plush William in the gift shop of the Cloisters. To have him and never go? That would be odd.
My fit for a day at a museum in NYC:

The book I had as a kid that was my exposure to The Met and it's collections was called A Tale of Two Williams. It's about a kid who doesn't want to go to the museum, but his mom drags him there. He finds a sentient, talking creature chained to a wall and agrees to free it. In exchange William the Hippo shows William the Little Boy around the museum, except no on else is there and the pictures were clearly taken at night. So, it's a kid and this creature wandering around Egyptian tombs at night. I wasn't able to find many pictures of the book, but here are a few:


Which brings me to my question...
Open to: Registered Users, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 4
Is this book a
View AnswersCute adventure book for kids, no notes
2 (50.0%)
Baby's first liminal horror
2 (50.0%)
I spent a lot of time with that book as a kid, copying the hieroglyphics over and over, because I wanted to learn Egyptian. I was a kid, the internet didn't exist, that book is what I had, so I filled pages and pages.
It's weird that I'd never been to the Met. In school we never did field trips to the NYC museums, the schools assumed we'd all been and often. Instead we went to museums that were hours in the other direction, often small niche ones, or went to artist's studios. Honestly, pretty impressive on the part of my schools. But, when I'd say I'd never been people were confused by it. In middle school I wrote an assigned essay on why museums like the Met are propaganda trying to shape America's concept of itself. I'd read and written about it, teachers again assuming we'd all had the experiences of being there and they were helping us engage with it. In front of the museum is a new courtyard with fountains, gifts of David Koch and very controversial attempt to buy legacy. Reading about it doesn't capture the weight of it, both the massive open galleries and the tightly packed mezzanine levels. As with the Cloisters, I was less interesting in the art and more in it being there and how it was displayed.
A room that was scooped up to moved to America so Americans could look at it:

There are a number of displays at the Met that are rooms. Some are like 'we have a bunch of furniture and stuff from the era and here is how a room could have looked' and some of it is like 'we liked this bedroom/dining room so we took it to go'
Then there's this:


Then you head up into the crowded balcony and mezzanine areas and:

Also, I did a thing, or tried to do a thing:
youtube short of a zoom out in the area Wish I could embed shorts like other youtube videos. Anyway, I loved spending time there and eating fruit cups on the balcony. I know I sound very critical of museums, and I am, but they are also amazing and I still enjoy them and get a lot out of them. The Met is just so massive and weighty.
( A few more pics )